![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkQQ1jrfkeIHBRfYs7b81r-wgWgxXDQZ5COD-UZSuVkgwj5Nf5YfwX9NI2pWDU5whUW0nAVEwVW_OPiOCkM5MON6n0dEDmH_sH1JkbL9iGLhN6CMLu-mubf8LgTBucAEt7IykY2cbyzv4G/s320/406Souter.sff.embedded.prod_affiliate.138.jpg)
1. Marbury V. Madison (1803): This radical decision ESTABLISHED THE ABILITY OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TO DECLARE LAWS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Otherwise known as Judicial Review.
2. Brown V. Board of Education (1954): SEPERATE IS thankfully NOT EQUAL. This decision marks the beginning of the end of segregation.
3. Roe V. Wade (1973): A controversy-free decision about a practically invisible issue called abortion rights.
Honorable Mention: Engel V. Vitale (1962): Declared official school prayers (the Almighty God kind) unconstitutional. You know, the whole seperation of church and state thing.
In closing, activist judges can be liberal OR conservative (see Dred Scott V. Sandford, Lone Wolf V. Hitchcock, U.S. V. Lopez). The big issue with the upcoming nomination of Justice Souter's replacement is whether or not he/she will uphold Roe V. Wade, i.e. is he/she pro-choice. The details concerning abortion rights can make for a tough conversation, no doubt, but DOES UPHOLDING A SUPREME COURT DECISION FROM 1973 MAKE ONE AN "ACTIVIST"? I don't think so, but more importantly, should we be chastising the decisions that shaped America thanks to this activism?
2 comments:
it's good to see your getting into Social Media. You need analytics and some more links... looks good, so far. Nice job! See you tomorrow.
Why didn't YOU go to law school? I think you put forth an admirable list, though I bet Morse v. Frederick (better known as Bong Hits for Jesus) would also raise your ire.
Post a Comment